By Michelle Crouch
Three North Carolina legislators said they are interested in revisiting the state law that gives special privileges to hospital authorities such as Atrium Health, noting that today’s multibillion-dollar hospital systems are nothing like the ones lawmakers had in mind when the law was written.
The hospital authorities act was written in 1943, “when a lot of county-owned hospitals were struggling to keep their doors open,” said Rep. Donny Lambeth (R-Winston-Salem), a former hospital administrator who is a co-chair of the House Health Committee in the state legislature.
“It’s different today when they’re making billions.”
Rep. Larry Potts (R-Lexington) and Sen. Jim Burgin (R-Angier) told The Ledger/NC Health News that they, too, have concerns about the law. Potts is senior chairman of the House’s health committee, and Burgin is a co-chair of the Senate’s health care committee.
The lawmakers’ call for a review comes after a recent Charlotte Ledger/NC Health News article examined the benefits Atrium enjoys as a unit of local government called a “hospital authority.”
Those benefits include the power of eminent domain, which means the hospital can force property owners to sell to make way for hospital expansion; extra tax breaks, even on property that is not being used for medical purposes; and protection from certain federal regulations, including antitrust damages.
Those advantages have helped Atrium grow into a powerful, multi-state hospital chain whose executives receive millions in compensation. The hospital system tied to the authority reported $9.3 billion in annual revenue in 2023. And the company has an additional $19 billion in revenue under its combinations with Wake Forest Baptist and Advocate Aurora Health.
Lambeth said he wants to consider whether the hospital authority law gives Atrium “such an advantage that we need to either enforce or change the law.”
Burgin said he would like to have “some very candid, frank, adult conversations” about the law, asking, “Do these (laws) make sense? And is it right and fair? Because I think some of it is not fair.”
Potts pointed out that much has changed in the 75 years since the original hospital authority act was written. “We need their services and their benefits,” he said. “We also need to look at the costs of what those benefits are.”
The lawmakers also expressed disappointment that Atrium receives those benefits but doesn’t operate in the same open and transparent manner as other government entities.
Atrium: We are fulfilling the original intent of the law
Asked to respond to lawmaker concerns, an Atrium spokesman emailed a statement that said the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, which does business as Atrium Health, “will continue to operate and abide by the law.”
It also said:
Atrium Health continues to fulfill the original intent of the North Carolina Hospital Authorities Act — to “protect the public health, safety, and welfare, including that of low income persons” … With deep roots in every community we are privileged to serve, we proudly embrace our “for all” approach that ensures no patient needing care is turned away because of their ability or inability to pay for their care.
The statement said Atrium provided $2.8 billion in free care and other community benefits in its larger service area in 2022.
Lambeth: ‘They can’t have it both ways’
Atrium has emphasized in court filings that as a governmental unit, it “must comply with North Carolina’s public records and open meetings laws.” However, it doesn’t interpret the public records and open meetings laws in the same way as other government boards.
For example, the authority doesn’t release the agenda for its board meetings in advance or set aside time for the public to speak. It also closes its committee meetings to the public, even though that is where most deliberation happens.
For comparison, CarolinaEast, a hospital authority in Craven County, N.C., does allow the public to attend committee meetings and speak to its board.
“They can’t have it both ways, quite frankly,” Lambeth said of Atrium. “I don’t think you can take advantage in one arena but not another. Either act like a government entity or act like a not-for-profit system.”
All three lawmakers said they think Atrium’s board should follow the state’s open meetings laws in the same way as other appointed and elected government boards. That means conducting deliberations in the public eye, Burgin said.
“If they’re going to be a quasi-governmental agency, they’ve got to play by those rules,” Burgin said. “If they don’t want to, then they need to be some other entity. They may have to make a choice — you can do it this way or you can do it that way, but you can’t do it both ways.”
Leave a Reply